In civil matters, the jury often consists of 9 members. Mini laptop is designed for swift and easy computing. In most states in Australia, the verdict in a jury trial needs to be unanimous, that is, all the jurors need to agree whether the defendant is innocent or guilty. There is a certain level of certainty. Appearing before the High Court on charges of contempt of court, Fraill sobbed, rocking back and forth, before admitting that she did communicate with the defendant. At first the use of the jury was providing local knowledge and acting more like witnesses rather than the decision makers that they are seen as today.
However, who knows, perhaps in the nearest future this jury system will be reformed — it got changed so many times throughout the centuries anyways. There are several reasons for this decline. Those jurors are going to do whatever it takes to get out of there as soon as possible, even if that may mean following the crowd and going against what they believe and send an innocent person to prison. It is important to look at the benefits and drawbacks of each of these systems. In this way, a jury can be rigged, and it might be in the defendant's best interest to have a trial by a single judge instead of a jury. When you are tried by a jury, the idea is that you are being tried by your peers rather than a single magistrate or judge, who may or may not be able to relate to your personal circumstances. Impartiality in adjudicating is therefore based on ignorance of the facts.
By hiring a lawyer who knows the local criminal judges, you can avoid having your case heard by a judge who might hand down a harsher sentence for a particular crime. Each of the fifty states has its own state constitution and governmental structure. To give some rough estimates, in Virginia nearly 90% of cases end in guilty pleas i. While it is proven that there are reasonable alternatives to a jury trial and that there is no doubt that jury trial is both time consuming and expensive when compared with trial by magistrates or by a judge alone, however the right to a jury trial shall not be dismissed so lightly. An example would be that some people are biased towards the police which is why people with specific criminal convictions are disqualified from sitting on a jury. Nevertheless, there could be some other alternatives to having a jury. This report shows that well educated, skilled people and professionals are under-represented as only skilled manual workers and unskilled workers have enough time to judge longer trials.
Another significant factor in the advantages of having a jury is jury equity. The State of Maharashtra, it does have many advantages. If there is a charming, influential presentation in court, then that alone may be enough to create sufficient reasonable doubt. A jury is considered by most as one of the fundamentals of a democratic society and the right to be tried by our peers has been supported by many renowned judges. Fourthly, the jury system is democratic.
My advice if you are sitting on a jury is to form your own opinion based on the evidence before you and try to ignore the more emotive messages you might be getting from the defence, prosecution and fellow jurors. Whether you appear in the magistrates court for your offence largely depends on what you have been charged with. It varies upon the judge and the facts of the case to make a determination. Welcome to CreateDebate CreateDebate is a social debate community built around ideas, discussion and democracy. Other competitors may use similar idea to yours and then you will have no unique selling point.
However, this can also be seen as a disadvantage because to some it is unjustified and perverse. This law governs both state and. The judge guides the juries in determining the facts they can admit into evidence and the ones they must exclude. The judge plays the role of fact finder and the ruler of procedure and matters of law. In many cases, the charges even for serious offences are laid in the local court to begin with, and then progress to a defended trial by jury at a later stage if the defendant pleads not guilty.
Where the defendants were charged with helping a spy escape from prison however this did not come about until it had been wrote about in a book twenty five years later. Criminal Justice Act 2003: The statute. Since the bench system does not require the lengthy process of a witness interview, impartial jury selection and cross-examination the cost borne by the parties are less. The right type of trial can help you make sure you get the best possible outcome for your case. If a person gets a judge who is reasonable, they may want to bench-try the case. Certain types of drunk driving cases are usually not good candidates for a bench trial. Adv: Jury equity - Kronlids case: 3 women broke into an aeroplane factory and destroyed planes being made for the indonesian government, causeing millions of pounds worth of damage.
Jury trials tend to take longer than those by judge alone. From my experience the main issue with jury trials is that they can be heavily influenced by personalities. Evaluate the accuracy of this statement with regard to the advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, the alternatives available and any reforms that have been introduced or recommended. Throughout the centuries the great legal minds have sought to protect and defend the right to trial by jury. It seems likely that trial by jury is more of an advantage to the public than a disadvantage as explained earlier that the public would rather be tried by regular people rather than those of an elite background, so does this suggest that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? The thing is that a jury is there to find on the matters of fact only.