As a result of the violation of the non-compete agreement, appellee petitioned the trial court for a temporary and permanent injunction and damages. There was no fraud, no misrepresentation, no sharp practice and no dealing between unequal parties. They disclose some drinking by the two parties but not to an extent that they were unable to understand fully what they were doing. The agreement that was written and signed is in the record and indicates no such change. Waived, no authority and no argument was. Both of the Zehmers testified that when Zehmer asked his wife to sign he whispered that it was a joke so Lucy wouldn't hear and that it was not intended that he should hear.
The letters from Lucy to her mother can be written from two perspectives. Zehmer replied that he had not. It is an unusual, if not bizarre, defense. Whether the writing signed by the defendants and now sought to be enforced by the complainants was the result of a serious offer by Lucy and a serious acceptance by the defendants, or was a serious offer by Lucy and an acceptance in secret jest by the defendants, in either event it constituted a binding contract of sale between the parties. Zehnmer, and she did sign it. Fields of Reading Mirrors Fields of reading is a book containing numerous curriculum divisions of social sciences, art and humanities as well as sciences.
The contract and the evidence show that he was not expected to pay the money that night. The court first found that the parties were not so intoxicated as to invalidate the deal. But it is likewise true that the discretion which may be exercised is not an arbitrary or capricious one, but one which is controlled by the established doctrines and settled principles of equity; and, generally, where a contract is in its nature and circumstances unobjectionable, it is as much a matter of course for courts of equity to decree a specific performance of it as it is for a court of law to give damages for a breach of it. It is contradicted by other evidence as to the condition of both parties, and rendered of no weight by the testimony of his wife that when Lucy left the restaurant she suggested that Zehmer drive him home. But it is likewise true that the discretion which may be exercised is not an arbitrary or capricious one, but one which is controlled by the established doctrines and settled principles of equity; and, generally, where a contract is in its nature and circumstances unobjectionable, it is as much a matter of course for courts of equity to decree a specific performance of it as it is for a court of law to give damages for a breach of it.
December 20 was on Saturday. The attorney reported favorably on December 31 and on January 2 Lucy wrote Zehmer stating that the title was satisfactory, that he was ready to pay the purchase price in cash and asking when Zehmer would be ready to close the deal. Zehmer 1954 was a court case in the Supreme Court of Virginia. Law program offers a course entitled Fundamentals Of U. December 20 was on Saturday. Environmental Studies Environmental Studies Efforts to protect the environment has been a touchy issue with the affected parties pointing a finger at one another for blame.
The question of the applicability of the contract was based on the appearance of the agreement. It is an unusual, if not bizarre, defense. I am not going to sell you the farm. An agreement or mutual assent is of course essential to a valid contract but the law imputes to a person an intention corresponding to the reasonable meaning of his words and acts. This was due to the fact that she had to undergo chemotherapy from a very young age. Zehmer was that he considered the offer of Lucy to purchase Ferguson as a joke, and at the time they signed the document both of the respondents were drunk.
Lucy appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Lucy thereafter then engaged his attorney to conduct title research and prepare to close the transaction. Zehmer replied by letter, mailed on January 13, asserting that he had never agreed or intended to sell. It was in fact conceded by defendants' counsel in oral argument that under the evidence Zehmer was not too drunk to make a valid contract. In addition, the intervention in environmental protection is achievable through the state participation by endorsing regulations in favour of environmental protection. Written in plain English, not in legalese.
Lucy said Zehmer handed it to him. Yet where, as in the instant case, there is no circumstance of fraud, misrepresentation, sharp dealing or other inequity, specific performance should be ordered. The very next day he arranged with his brother to put up half the money and take a half interest in the land. The complainants are entitled to have specific performance of the contract sued on. Zehmer said that after the writing was signed he laid it down on the counter in front of Lucy. The assignment of error is to this action of the court.
After they managed to collect the amount, Lucy again announced her intention to buy a farm from Zehmer in accordance with their agreement. They disclose some drinking by the two parties but not to an extent that they were unable to understand fully what they were doing. She was some distance away and did not see either of them sign the paper. This is all a joke. Zehmer, however, he refused to close and claimed that the agreement was meant to be a joke, and that he had never intended for the deal to be taken seriously. The day after that he employed an attorney to examine the title.
The contract and the evidence show that he was not expected to pay the money that night. Lucy reached over and took it, said let me see it. This suit was instituted by W. Lucy, the other complainant, is a brother of W. It agreed with Zehmer and dismissed the case. Zehmer did, and he and Lucy had one or two drinks together.
Appellants agreed orally to follow the medical instructions and to supply Kly with food, shelter, care and the medicine which he required. Zehmer until Zehmer came in. It is an unusual, if not bizarre, defense. Zehmer, his wife, defendants, to have specific performance of a contract by which it was alleged the Zehmers had sold to W. As a result, Zehmer's wife signed an agreement. Lucy reached over and said, 'Let's see it.