On most occasions, you'll find that the kids who have committed a crime are very young -- as young as 9 and 10. Teens should be tried as adults. Committing a crime is never the right answer. However, most states have caveats to this rule. Younger prisoners are also at a disadvantage because they are not as mature mentally and physically as older prisoners. And black youth are nearly five times as likely to be incarcerated than their white peers. Teens who commit a serious crime should not be sentenced to an adult prison, they should be sentenced to a juvenile prison for however long there sentence is.
These are just a couple of the things to consider when asking if a juvenile should be tried as an adult. Indeed, people now act as if the decision to treat a juvenile as a juvenile implies a judgment that the crime was not that serious, the victims not that worthy of respect. However, there are still plenty of juvenile crimes happening. Teenagers are not adults; therefore, they should not be tried as adults. The idea was to educate and rehabilitate juveniles so as to attack what were believed to be the roots of juvenile delinquency—a lack of moral education and standards. I don't believe that we should be able to ruin a kids whole life for what they did in their teenage years. Reporter, Frontline video I was thinking about this, and what if they opened a teen prison? He was attacked and held at gunpoint until the cops got there.
At the National Institute of Mental Health researchers have studied the human brain ever since the stage of birth all the way to adulthood, to prove that the brain is not complete. In the last decade, virtually every state has made it much easier to try juveniles as adults. The problem with these punishments, however, is that they effectively take away a valuable lesson that a juvenile is supposed to learn while serving the terms of his sentence. Now there are, and will always be fine lines where people say and think should be earned and what should be equally given. Harsh sentencing acts as a deterrent to kids who are considering committing crimes. It all started when these three men did this.
In North Carolina as well, there have been attempts to raise the age in the legislature, though no measures have passed to date. There has been a rise in prosecutorial discretion laws. A series of Supreme Court decisions, state policy changes and plummeting crime rates since the late 1990s have resulted in major reductions in the youth prison population. Supreme Court mandatory sentences of life without parole for teens was unconstitutional. Juveniles in adult court also recidivated sooner and more frequently. There is always a price, nothing is ever free. Sentenced as an adult but, they are around people that are their age.
Her case was transferred to adult court, and Johnson was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. Just because a child commits a crime does not mean that the crime is not committed, it does not mean that the victim didn't suffer. Why shouldn't they be held accountable for their actions? Maybe that seems to work? Should teenagers be tried as adult? If they are old enough to decide what they want to do with their own life, they are old enough to understand that they could be changing someone else's by committing a crime; especially murder. Many facts point to the conclusion that juveniles should not be tried as adults. Because of people like you, another world is possible.
Common Dreams is not your normal news site. That's possibly 4 crimes and you'd be going to jail for about 6 years depending on what the judge thinks. All kids, from a young age, understand that murder is wrong. Take the right action, receive the right consequence. Each year thousands of juveniles under the age of 18 are arrested. The report, , ultimately found that there has been little to no deterrent effect on juveniles prosecuted in adult court, and in many states, recidivism rates have actually increased. Take for instance the case of Skylar Neese, who was murdered by two of her best friends, Shelia Eddy and Rachel Shoaf.
Teens are not mature enough to be tried as adults. The researchers found what many of us were trying to say years earlier about Cameron Kocher: that at the age of 9, he simply couldn't process information and plan a crime like an adult. At what age should one be held accountable for their actions? Most children should know when something is right or wrong and know when they are committing a crime. Check out these for ideas. So we change the rules of the game. Violent crimes receive the harshest punishments, and it is said that the same should carry forth and continue for children as well.
The following year a new law was put on the books in Massachusetts. There has been a big debate going on about whether juveniles should be tried as adults or juveniles, and things just keep getting more and more out of hand. Fewer varieties of punishment In an adult court, criminals can only end up in prison, and even risk being given the death penalty. When it comes to this topic, Americans assume that if a teenage commits a crime than they should not be held accountable because of their age. The idea comes from the fact that the brain is often slower to develop than the body so we should not punish teenagers excessively for making mistakes.