So , voting should not be compulsory. Although there would be fines as a result of a violation, these could not be enough to compensate what the government has to spend to impose the law. Over twenty countries have some form of compulsory voting which requires citizens to register to vote and to go to their polling place or vote on Election Day. Compulsory voting would ensure the governing party has the majority of the country on its side, and better reflect the wishes of the people. Social programs create two dependent classes, the bureaucracy and the recipients. Mandatory voting will lead to worse policymaking? Now, if you do not vote you are still voting; just in a different way than most think about. Doug Chapin, an election expert at the University of Minnesota, disagreed.
Australians seem to be no more politically educated and are perhaps less so than citizens of comparable countries for example, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom that use voluntary voting. Had the other occupants of the lifeboat given empty, compulsory votes, they could have made a decision under pressure that led to their demise. Obama and progressives do not care about the people because in their minds we are all dumb asses. Then I realized being a principled non-voter was marginally better since I'm not tacitly approving of the policies of any winners I manage to pick, and I can still bitch about government. Voluntary voting does not necessarily produce bias to the wealthy or well educated. Some have even suggested people to vote, rather than fining the apathetic.
While I am not saying it is an unvirtuous thing to vote — I admire anyone who votes for a genuinely ethical party against the advice of a strong majority — I do not think rewarding a reward makes a lot of sense. We are lucky that this country has given the right for women to vote. Voting is an integral part of democracy, without this process we go back to an oligarchy were only a few number of people decide; The idea of democracy is to avoid this. In a democracy the cream of the crap floats to the top because of that fact. This may not seem much, but is significant if we consider the by which elections are often won. I read that and changed my mind on the whole issue.
This is simply not the case. There is a final reason for the country to embrace universal voting, and it may be the most compelling: Democracy cannot be strong if citizenship is weak. Political scientists worry about this because older and wealthier Americans vote more often than anyone else. What you do in the privacy of the booth is entirely up to you. Because that's what normally happens. It is always promises that are broken you can't trust politicians they are all bred to lie and miss lead in the end. Australians who do not show up are subject to fines although those who were ill or otherwise incapable of voting on election day can have their fines waived.
With Australia's compulsory voting system comes additional flexibility for the voter — elections are held on Saturdays, absent voters can vote in any state polling place, and voters in remote areas can vote before an election at pre-poll voting centers or via mail. If so could other basic rights be waived? As a result, determining the best candidate would be easier. Promote Political Stability Where there is division there is instability. That is the question some Australians have been asking since voting became required by law here nearly a century ago. If voting were made voluntary, it would shake up the political system. He said candidates would have an incentive to campaign to everyone, not just the wealthier, older people who disproportionately vote today.
Not one single sound idea or policy, ever. When we do this, we are no longer the United States, and no longer a free country. They voted that they don't care enough or aren't informed enough to mark a ballot. Through internal arrangements and agreements withing the government, manipulation of public opinion, nothing is changing. Every journalist who supported this turd or failed to criticize him since 2008 should fall on a sword.
In the United States, candidates like Jesse Jackson have shown that the poor and relatively uneducated can be mobilised in large numbers behind candidates who support their concerns. Fowler speculates that few Americans would be excited by the idea. Critics argue that the resulting surplus of politically ignorant voters has three main negative consequences: Misleading uninformed voters. People and politicians are encouraged to act according to what the majority needs, and not according to the individual interests of their political party. After all, the whole point of democracy is giving everyone the freedom to make their own choices, to voice out their opinions. If nobody would be required to vote, then we would get stuck with horrible leaders who would make terrible laws and create awful policies.
But many experts think it's a good idea. It would be hypocritical to say that voting in your leaders is important abroad, while not caring domestically. You know the 1% already mailed in their ballots. It would be transformative if everybody voted — that would counteract money more than anything. Historically, women have had a much harder time in getting the vote. It is not hypocrisy because we still offer the democratic process, holding free and fair general elections no later than every 5 years.
Padraic McGuinness makes a powerful point about how : One of the worst features of totalitarian or oppressive regimes is that it is necessary to take an interest in politics under them, either as a result of coercion into official demonstrations and so on or in order to contest their power. When this happens, it will require a large sum for law to be enforced, which would involve finding out who may or may not have broken the mandate. That presumes, however, that policymaking today sets a high-water mark of enlightenment. Crockett was naive to believe private donations are sufficient. It's what the our Country was build on. This not only enhances the clarity of the peoples opinions, but also helps people to engage in politics. Each year, millions of people fail to vote without reproach.
I say, for the sake of Australia, that voting should not be compulsory. Increases Costs Elections need money. A short advertisement is likely to have a greater influence on an uninformed voter than one who already has strong views. Long-time political insider and commentator Paula Matthewson, who makes a conscious decision not to vote and pays the fine instead, says the problem goes beyond young voters. A number of retorts are often given to this question, most of which, as Eric Liu , reflect nothing more than a pessimistic valuation of democracy. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has made mobilising the youth vote central to his 2013 campaign. They are reaping a reward — it is like one free voucher to slightly more political power than they would otherwise have.